![]() The need for an initial disambiguation involved separating the specification of a part by (traditional) position and by (recently introduced) name. The issue here seems to be one of meta-language and disambiguation with a certain incoherency present with the current semantics. While related to language design, subtlities such as these do impact de-bugging, the selection of apt data structures and internal consistency as a WL Data Science code bases mature. Summary: Yes it is a "bug" and it also suggests changing, #& and KeyTake's key extracting semantics:īackground: A Disambiguating Imperative Emerges: You would be of course right if you said that using key names which themselves include Key is not a very good idea anyway, but if the language can be designed to avoid ambiguities, I think it is really better to do so. This is what I'd consider a bug instead of wrapped forms not working where only names are expected. Both Lookup, default] and Lookup give 1 even though Key =!= "z". You noticed that Lookup does indeed accept both wrapped and unwrapped keys, and this leads to some strange behaviour. Wizard points it out, how could we even test reliably if a key exists or not? What would asc] refer to? The key "z" or the key Key? As Mr. (* 5 Missing]] *)Īllowing both wrapped ( Key) and unwrapped names in situations where only key names are expected would lead to ambiguities. These rules will make key handling convenient and unambiguous: asc = 1, 1 -> 2, Key -> 3, "z" -> 4, Key -> 5,ĭuring evaluation of Part::pkspec1: The expression a cannot be used as a part specification. Any other expression is disallowed.įunctions that can only take keys, interpret the key name literally. An exception is strings, which are automatically treated as if they were already wrapped in Key. , KeyExistQ, KeyTake, Lookup, etc.īased on 10.1 behaviour, this appears to be the general behaviour:įunctions that can take numerical arguments as well require key names to be wrapped by Key.One that can take either numerical indices or keys, such as:Īnd another one that takes only keys, such as How would you design associations if your goal was to allow any expression to be a key (useful as shown by GroupBy, Counts, etc.) and also keep associations user friendly?Īs I see, the primary function of Key is to disambiguate between numerical indices and keys that can be any expression in functions that take both. What follows is just personal opinion on why, backed up by observations. But, like others, I also consider this change an improvement. “We transform communities by building integrity and trust through effective communication and relationship building to instill a value where "follow through" is a commitment.Only the designer could say if this is a bug or a bugfix. Our Culture- Making great efforts to maintain and create value by delivering exceptional service to our board of directors and its membership. Our Vision- To be the most trusted and sought-after association management company based on our reputation for upstanding communications and long-term success rates. Our Mission-To deliver superior service and build long term relationships with our clients. Our aim is to offer effective focused solutions and our desire is to deliver a stronger client communication system, which is the hallmark of Key Association Management and a value that sets us apart from our competition. We have been exceeding the unique needs of associations for over two decades. We don’t know how you feel about being on the receiving end of exceptional customer experiences, but we make it our priority as to how we do business with all our clients. We fulfill this desire by offering effective solutions that fit the needs and goals of our clients using digital record management, modern technology, impeccable financial management, experienced industry professionals and a structured system, all of which better enhances the customer experience. Key Association Management was built as a result of recognizing a desire for stronger client communication systems. Key Association Management has serviced condominiums and homeowners’ associations throughout southeastern Michigan for over 26 years. Key Association Management is a Second-Generation Family Owned and Operated business. If you would like to make an appointment to meet with one of our staff members, please call our office or send us an email at and a member of our staff will contact you. Our office staff is working hard to service the needs of our clients and residents. Our office hours are by appointment only. Michigan's #1 Association Management Company
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |